MINELRES: Caucasus Reporting Service No. 315: Cool Welcome for Meskhetians
Sat Nov 26 09:08:35 2005
Original sender: Institute for War & Peace Reporting <firstname.lastname@example.org>
WELCOME TO IWPR'S CAUCASUS REPORTING SERVICE, No. 315, November 23, 2005
CAUCASUS NEWS UPDATE NOVEMBER 23
AZERBAIJAN: A QUESTION OF CHANGE Political changes are now inevitable –
but will they be gradual or turbulent? By Margarita Akhvlediani and
Shahin Rzayev in Baku
COOL WELCOME FOR MESKHETIANS Muslims exiled by Stalin are to be legally
entitled to go back at last, but convincing many Georgians this is a
good idea is likely to be a difficult task. By Fati Mamiashvili in
****************** VISIT IWPR ON-LINE: www.iwpr.net ***************
COOL WELCOME FOR MESKHETIANS
Muslims exiled by Stalin are to be legally entitled to go back at last,
but convincing many Georgians this is a good idea is likely to be a
By Fati Mamiashvili in Tbilisi
After almost six years of wrangling with the Council of Europe, Georgia
is finally taking steps to allow the Muslim Meskhetians to return home
after a 60-year exile.
However, convincing Georgians to welcome back the community – deported
by Stalin towards the end of the Second World War – will prove
difficult. Many local people are suspicious of what they regard as an
alien group who will not be easily assimilated. There is also the more
pragmatic consideration of absorbing extra immigrants for a state
already beset by numerous economic and social problems.
Making provision for the Meskhetians is a condition of Georgia’s
membership of the Council of Europe, CoE, since it joined in 1999. In
March 2005, the CoE issued a statement urging the government to comply
with the request.
But although the government is clearly keen to keep its promises to the
CoE, many Georgians think it has gone too far in bending to the pressure
on the Meskhetian issue.
In line with the CoE’s minorities programme, by the end of this year,
Georgia will complete preparations to enable tens of thousands of
descendants of Meskhetians to return to their motherland, if they want.
ONE OF STALIN'S "PUNISHED PEOPLES"
The deported Muslim group used to live in the Meskheti area of southern
Georgia, now the Samtskhe-Javakheti administrative region. They are also
known as Meskhetian Turks, as there is some dispute about whether the
majority are basically Turkish or Georgian in origin.
Stalin took against them, as he did with many ethnic groups across the
Soviet Union. In this instance it was probably because the tide of the
Second World War had turned in his favour, allowing him to consider
aggressive action towards Turkey, and suggesting a need to clear away
possible Turkish sympathisers.
Most of the deportations took place on the night of November 14, 1944.
Almost the entire population of Meskhetian Muslims was rounded up and
packed on to freight trains by security forces. By dawn, more than
92,000 people had gone, bound for a harsh life of exile in Central Asia.
Historian Marat Baratashvili, who runs a group called the Union of
Meskhetian Repatriates, recalls, “My father Latipsha Baratishvili, a
village teacher, helped his fellow villagers on the night of the
deportation, because he thought he was carrying out [Communist] party
orders. But then he was put into one of the railcars himself along with
his Christian wife.”
The Meskhetians are thought to be the last of the peoples deported
wholesale by Stalin to be given the right to return to their motherland.
The Chechens, Ingush, Karachay and Balkar of the North Caucasus and the
Kalmyks of southern Russia were allowed back after the dictator’s death
in 1953; the Crimean Tatars and Volga Germans were permitted to leave
Central Asia only in the latter years of the Soviet Union – the former
going home to Ukraine and many of the latter emigrating to Germany.
IMPLEMENTING THE REPATRIATION PLAN
As a condition of its membership of the CoE, which it joined in 1999,
Georgia is required to facilitate the return of the Meskhetians by 2011.
Teimuraz Lomsadze, an adviser to the Ministry of Conflict Regulation who
is working closely with the CoE minorities committee for protecting
ethnic minorities, told IWPR that the repatriation will start next year.
Last month, a government commission headed by the minister of conflict
regulation, Georgi Khaindrava, travelled to the Central Asian republics
to assess the possible scale of repatriation.
Accommodating tens of thousands of new settlers - no one really knows
how many will opt to come - will be extremely hard for a country whose
economy is weak, and which has already received tens of thousands of
refugees as a result of the conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
“It is a complicated process,” admitted Lomsadze. “But the biggest
problem is money. We are hoping for aid from the governments of various
countries, from international organisations, and from the state budget.”
The repatriation will be made possible by a law which is currently being
drafted and which according to Khaindrava will come into force in 2006.
In its statement earlier this year, the CoE’s Parliamentary Assembly
noted that the law was supposed to have been adopted two years after
Georgia joined the international body in 1999.
The first task for the authorities is to establish how many people are
likely to come. Khaindrava’s Central Asian trip in mid-October was
intended to inform a more accurate assessment of the numbers involved.
According to a 2004 report from the European Centre for Minorities,
ECMI, most of the diaspora live in Kazakstan – up to 100,000 people –
and Azerbaijan, which may have as many as 110,000. In addition, there
are up to 30,000 in Kyrgyzstan, and perhaps 15,000 in Uzbekistan, and
5,000-10,000 in Ukraine.
Most of the once large community in Uzbekistan left after ethnic
violence there in 1989, and moved to Russia, Azerbaijan or other
A further group, estimated at more than 25,000, now lives in Turkey,
which they are unlikely to want to leave.
Khaindrava’s team talked to Meskhetians in Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan and
Uzbekistan, and examined files on deported individuals, which are held
in the state archives of these countries.
“In the Bishkek archive alone there are up to 75,000 personal files
relating to various deported nations,” said Lomsadze. “And then we will
have to compare all the information there with what we find in the
Georgian archives. We have to prevent a situation where people unrelated
to the Meskhetian Muslims decide to come to our country.”
After the trip, Khaindrava concluded, “Our overall impression is that
the descendants of the deported Meskhetians know almost nothing about
Georgia. But most of them want the right to live in their motherland.”
At home, the government is now planning the practical steps that will
make repatriation possible. Two centres will be opened in west and east
Georgia where the families of returning Meskhetians will stay for at
least three months, learning about the country’s culture and history and
studying the language. The foreign ministry is already talking to the
European Union about funds for this part of the programme.
Then the authorities will need to identify the areas where the returnees
are to be settled, allocate land to them and provide jobs or pensions.
They may also open bilingual schools where teaching will be conducted in
Georgian and Turkish.
Another area that the government plans to address is encouraging public
opinion to be more receptive, and that is likely to prove an uphill
Apart from natural concerns about providing for the incomers, the
Meskhetian issue is highly emotive.
“Mass repatriation of the Muslim community is dangerous because the
majority of them have no intention of identifying themselves as
Georgians,” Nodar Natadze, leader of the nationalist Popular Front
party, told a press conference in August. “They want to come here and
live as Turks.”
The majority of people whom IWPR asked for their opinion of the
repatriation programme expressed doubt and in some cases outright
hostility to the issue.
“Settle the Meskhetian Turks in Georgia on a large scale? Tbilisi is
already overflowing with refugees from Samachablo [South Ossetia] and
Abkhazia,” said Tbilisi resident David Gachechiladze. “Let Georgians
living abroad come back! Why bring in Muslims who differ from us in
At the same time, Gachechiladze said he feels “sincerely sorry for this
In the Samtskhe-Javakheti region, some local people harked back to the
ethnically-tinged conflicts in the southern Caucasus that followed the
1917 Russian Revolution. Local Georgians told stories of Muslim attacks
on Christian villagers in 1918-19 to justify their present hostility.
By contrast, Baratashvili insists that “in days gone by, there were
absolutely normal, good-neighbourly relations with the Meskhetian
Muslims, so their return does not pose the slightest danger to anyone.
In actual fact the danger comes from possible provocations and the
political games played by bigger countries”.
IMMIGRATION A MIXED SUCCESS TO DATE
Baratashvili is one of the small number of Meskhetians who quietly
settled in Georgia before there was any talk of repatriation. His Union
of Meskhetian Repatriates collects information on the approximately 600
returnees now living in various parts of Georgia.
Such groups as have returned have settled in Samtskhe-Javakheti and
other areas. Baratashvili ended up in the capital Tbilisi after finding
life untenable in Akhaltsikhe, the main town of Samtskhe-Javakheti, in
the Eighties. Others have clustered together in newly-built hamlets in
various parts of the country. IWPR reported the difficulties facing one
such community in 2003 in a report entitled Meskhetians Make a New Life
Many of these people talk of the discrimination they faced when they
tried to settle in Georgia. Gular Khutsishvili, who brought his family
to live in Akhaltsikhe a few years ago, told IWPR, “At first they really
persecuted us. They threw stones at our windows and shouted, ‘Get out of
“We had small children and they were really scared.. But gradually
everything calmed down and now everything’s alright.”
Gular’s relative Mamuka Khutsishvili, who moved to Akhaltsikhe in 1997,
considers himself a Georgian and sends his children to a Georgian
school, but his neighbours still call him a Turk.
“I am a Georgian, but other people find this hard to accept,” he said.
“When they call us Meskhetian Turks, they don’t understand that it’s
Some Georgians cite a difficult relationship with the existing settlers
as an argument for preventing more from coming.
Lali Kopaliani lives next to the Meskhetian-inhabited village of Akhali
Ianeti in the west Georgian province of Imereti, and regards her
neighbours as too different to be assimilated easily. “The only thing
they have is Georgian surnames,” she said. “We live by different rules
and we have a different religion. I don’t want the number of mixed
families to grow. What will the Georgian people turn into?”
LOCATION A KEY FACTOR
Right now it is unclear where the government plans to put the
repatriated Meskhetians – either in Samtskhe-Javakheti region alone, or
spread across Georgia.
The government appears to have opted for the second of these options.
“The question we heard most often during our visit to Central Asia was
whether they would be resettled in Meskhetia itself,” said Khaindrava.
“These people have experienced many misfortunes and humiliations, they
were forced to resettle outside Georgia, and it is our duty to return
them to their historical homeland.
“However, for those to whom Georgia is dear, as it is to all Georgians,
the motherland is the whole country, not just one part of it. So the
repatriates will be put wherever it is possible.”
Baratashvili counters this proposal by quoting the Georgian
constitution, which says every citizen has the right to live where he or
HOW MANY WILL ACTUALLY COME?
In reality, it is unlikely that anything like the entire diaspora will
want to return. The estimated 18,000 Meskhetians living in Russia’s
southern Krasnodar region might be keen to move as they have been given
a hard time by unwelcoming local authorities. But around 2,000 have
already been allowed to settle in the United States, and there is talk
of granting US residence to virtually the whole group in the next year.
A second group - the 100,000 or so in Azerbaijan - have found it easy to
assimilate into the local population as they are close in language,
culture and religion. Ibrahim Burkhanov, the local leader of Vatan, a
Meskhetian association, said on November 15 that repatriation was now a
realistic prospect given the positions of the Georgian government and
CoE. But it is unclear how many of the Azerbaijani community will opt to
exercise this right.
After his Central Asian trip, Khaindrava said that “in Kazakhstan, for
example, they have a good life - they live peacefully and have their own
smallholdings. Judging from our meetings with them, probably not more
than 20 or 25 per cent will want to come to Georgia”.
Members of the investigating commission would not be drawn on precise
figures, but they believe that many of those who decide to come back
will be the poor, and the elderly people who still remember the country.
Although Khaindrava suggested that about 30 per cent of the Meskhetians
abroad might return, it was unclear what figure he was using as a total.
“It will all become clear once we have looked at individual cases in the
archives in Central Asia,” said Lomsadze. “We need several months just
to do that.”
Fati Mamiashvili is a freelance journalist in Tbilisi.
****************** VISIT IWPR ON-LINE: www.iwpr.net ***************
IWPR's Caucasus Reporting Service provides the international community
with a unique insiders' perspective on events in the North and South
Caucasus. Using our network of local journalists, the service publishes
news and analysis from across the region every week.
The service forms part of IWPR's Caucasus programme, which supports
local media development while encouraging better local and international
understanding of the region.
IWPR's Caucasus programme is supported by the British government, the
European Union and the Finnish government. The service is currently
available online in English and in Russian.
To subscribe visit: http://www.iwpr.net/sub_form.html
For further details on this project and other information services and
media programmes, visit IWPR's website: www.iwpr.net
Editor-in-Chief: Anthony Borden; Managing Editor: Yigal Chazan; Acting
Project Coordinator and Editor: Teresa Cherfas; Senior Editor: John
MacLeod; Regional Director and Editor: Margarita Akhvlediani in Tbilisi;
Editor/Trainer: David Stern; Associate Editors: Shahin Rzayev in Baku,
Seda Muradian in Yerevan, Valery Dzutsev in Vladikavkaz and Timur Aliev
in Nazran. To comment on this service, write to: email@example.com
The Institute for War & Peace Reporting is a London-based independent
non-profit organisation supporting regional media and democratic change.
Lancaster House, 33 Islington High Street, London N1 9LH, United
Kingdom. Tel: +44 (0)20 7713 7130, Fax: +44 (0)20 7713 7140.
The opinions expressed in IWPR's Caucasus Reporting Service are those of
the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the publication or
ISSN: 1477-7959 Copyright (c) 2005 The Institute for War & Peace
CAUCASUS REPORTING SERVICE No.
This message was sent using Endymion MailMan.